Increasingly, we are seeing the blurring of borders in fiction. At one time, for example, mystery novels always contained certain clearly defined elements. There could be no paranormal explanations. Suspects always had real motives. Murders were not random. Romantic involvements were limited and not detailed. Romance novels also followed tried and true formulas and love conquered all.
In 2009, the term “mashup” came into being. Mashup, simply defined, means taking two or more different genres and mixing them up. For instance, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Slayer and Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, both by Seth Grahame-Smith, are good examples of mashup novels that take either historical figures or classic literature and combine them with horror. This form of hybrid work brings up intriguing questions regarding the future of fiction. Is this form of cross genre a good thing or is it merely pop culture at its worst? Short story writers have been combining genres for many years. Thus, the “speculative” fiction label often combines science fiction, fantasy and horror with mystery, romance, historical and even literary elements. So this is not new.
However, reviewers as well as readers are often confused when authors move away from pigeon-holed tried and true formulas for genre novels and experiment. Charlaine Harris, for example, tossed aside the usual rules of mystery writing and simply wrote what she really wanted to create–the secret to her superstar success. She wasn’t afraid to be different in style and subject and actually have fun with her writing. “Old school” mystery reviewers and writers frowned on using paranormal elements. They considered it a kind of cheating. Charlaine didn’t worry about that. The results speak for themselves.
Kim Reynolds, my psychic detective in four mystery novels, tries her best to repress this ability but it keeps showing up and helping her uncover murderers. My mystery series is also strong on romance, another no-no in old school mystery circles.
Novel writing is a dynamic, growing literary form. In my YA novel, THE DEVIL AND DANNA WEBSTER, I combined paranormal elements with everyday teen life, mixing reality and fantasy. In my Southern Gothic adult romance, DARK MOON RISING, I combined elements of the paranormal with those of a romantic suspense thriller.
In my latest novel, THE KILLING LAND, there are also a number of elements combined: historic Western, romance, and suspense thriller. I believe this makes for a stronger novel. For one thing, there is more in-depth characterization. For another, plot lines are less predictable.
In the 18th century, many authors experimented with novel writing, considering it a dynamic form of written expression. The writers weren’t afraid to be original or different.
They created unique novels with unforgettable characters such as: CLARISSA, TOM JONES, ROBINSON CRUSOE, GULLIVER, JOSEPH ANDREWS, PAMELA, MOLL FLANDERS and my favorite, TRISTRAM SHANDY. There was diversity in character, style and plot type which inspired subsequent generations who followed. The mashup novel is yet another experiment with the novel form. Will this manifestation last? To my mind, that is not the significant question. Will the novel survive as a literary form? I think the answer is emphatically yes because it is an art form that allows for change and constant evolution as does the short story. Fiction allows us to escape into another dimension that many of us need and want. That aspect is unchanging.
Do you take chances as a reader or a writer? Will you read or write books or short stories that do not follow standard genre formula plotting and characterization?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Multiple award-winning author, Jacqueline Seewald, has taught creative, expository and technical writing at Rutgers University as well as high school English. She also worked as both an academic librarian and an educational media specialist. Sixteen of her books of fiction have been published to critical praise including books for adults, teens and children. Her short stories, poems, essays, reviews and articles have appeared in hundreds of diverse publications and numerous anthologies such as: THE WRITER, L.A. TIMES, READER’S DIGEST, PEDESTAL, SHERLOCK HOLMES MYSTERY MAGAZINE, OVER MY DEAD BODY!, GUMSHOE REVIEW, THE MYSTERY MEGAPACK, LIBRARY JOURNAL, THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR and PUBLISHERS WEEKLY. Her writer’s blog can be found at: http://jacquelineseewald.blogspot.com.
The Killing Land can be purchased from Amazon for Kindle and in hardcover, from Barnes and Noble, and many other booksellers. *The hardcover edition can also be requested at local libraries.
Dark Moon Rising is available in all ebook formats as well as print: Amazon, iTunes, Barnes & Noble, All Romance eBooks, and Luminosity Publishing.
More from my site
Books, Books, and More Books
Fifteen Tips for Writing Mystery Novels that Sell … by Jacqueline Seewald
No Such Thing As “I Can’t” … by Amy Rivers
Jayne the Joyful Junco
Saying Good-bye to the Grapes and the Trellis
A to Z Challenge D is for Drum (and Karen Duvall and Dance of the Electric Hummingbird by Patricia Walker
I enjoy the originality of a mixed genre novel and hope to get adventurous enough to try writing one, someday. Until then, I enjoy yours, Jacqueline. I do agree that some readers have set expectations and become upset when they’re not met. I also believe that time will vindicate the mish-mash!
Kathy,
I admit I love an Agatha Christie type mystery as much as the next person, and I’m not big on anything gruesome. But I do like to mix it up a bit in my writing. I think fiction benefits from it.
Excellent post, Jacquie. I’ve read your books and loved them.
Carole,
I do appreciate your comments!
Whole heartedly agree. Good writing is good writing. With the evolution of ebooks more people are reading, although still not as many as we authors would like. My books are labeled cozy mysteries, yet two of them feature a private investigator in a series. The genre lines will continue to blur but readers will determine the degree of success. I will continue to write stories and let my characters tell me what direction to follow. That’s the fun of writing.
Well said, J.D.! I so agree.
Yes, genre-breaking is a healthy, vibrant sport. Keep going for it, Jacquie! Mix and mash. As always, you’re doing exceedingly well.
Thank you, Nancy. I hope to keep writing nonformula novels–all I need are more readers!
Great post Jacqueline and so true!
Some of the “mashup” stories sound ridiculous but obviously work.
Good luck and God’s Blessings!
PamT
Yes, Pam, I agree. Many unusual parings–some very creative.
Personally, I like the mashup–both as a writer and a reader. I do notice, however, that whenever I get a mediocre review, it is usually from someone expecting a “true” romance or even a “true” cozy mystery. Since I combine elements of suspense, mystery, history, paranormal and romance–well–reader expectation may not fit my work. Sigh. Thanks for a good post.
Hi Susan,
There will always be readers with narrow expectations of what is proper to a particular genre. It is important that those of us who write be true to our own vision. Hopefully, readers will come to appreciate that.
I haven’t read any of the mashups and don’t know if I will, but I think the fact they’re popular is a sign of the novel’s ability to change with the times and attract new readers. I’m waiting for the mashup between Grimm’s Fairy Tales and zombies–you know, where Little Red Riding Hood is on her way to grandmother’s house with a basket full of brains and–well, maybe not.
Very clever, Allan! Possibly the next bestseller?
This is really interesting! Thanks, both. I think that genre labels can be useful in terms of helping readers make choices and helping writers focus. But the problem is that they are limiting. I think there needs to be a balance between that very necessary focus, and too much rigidity.
Margot,
I particularly love mysteries and romances. However, I don’t enjoy boring predictability. For me the key to a really good book is well-developed characters that readers can care about.
Interesting post, Jacqueline. I’ve seen the titles and read the blurbs on this type of book, but didn’t realize the “genre”/style had a name. The categories are changing and so is the English language.
Yes, Maris, we are experimenting with the novel’s format and I see this as a good thing. Change is inevitable.
Sorry for the delay in posting the first comments today. First-time commenters have to be moderated, but after that their comments will go straight through without moderation. I’ll check frequently today to make sure no one’s comment is held too long.
Glad you’re here Jacqueline. I always love to have old friends from Five Star on the blog, no matter who they’re publishing with now that the romance and mystery lines have been dropped.
I rejoice that barriers for writing in some genres are coming down. I believe that the novel will remain alive and well in years to come.
I agree, Betty. The novel is a dynamic entity and that’s a good thing!
Jacquie, your blog made me rejoice that the barriers to writing in some genres are going away. I remember when Charlaine Harris began her work and she has been tremendously successful. The novel in all genres will stay alive!
Jacquie,
Great post!
I recently read “The Killing Land” and I loved it – a perfect example of the topic for this post. Writing “outside the box.”
Thank you, Pat. I so appreciate your support and am very glad that you enjoyed the novel.
Interesting post, Jacqueline. Thanks for sharing it.
Thank you, B.J. I look forward to reading your Five Star novel.
Patricia,
Thanks so much for inviting me to guest blog. I will respond to any comments or questions.